Publications

Publications

Filter Results: (142) Arrow Down

Show Results For

Page 1 of 142 Results →
  • 2017
  • Working Paper

Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court

By: Matthew Lilley, Richard Holden and Michael Keane
Using data on essentially every US Supreme Court decision since 1946, we estimate a model of peer effects on the Court. We consider both the impact of justice ideology and justice votes on the votes of their peers. To identify these peer effects we use two instruments.... View Details
Keywords: Supreme Court; Peer Effects; Voting Behavior; Legal System; Courts and Trials; Voting; Behavior
Related
  • February 2015
  • Supplement

The Affordable Care Act (I): The Supreme Court

By: Joseph L. Bower and Michael Norris
In the spring of 2012, the Supreme Court hears arguments and releases its decision on the constitutionality of the ACA. View Details
Keywords: Health Care; Health Care Policy; Government And Politics; Health; Policy; Health Industry; United States
Related
  • Web

Statement on Supreme Court Decision | About

Statement on Supreme Court Decision Harvard University leadership, including Dean Srikant Datar, address the Harvard community after the Supreme View Details
  • 15 Aug 2009
  • News

Can the Supreme Court Undress High Fund Fees?

  • 03 Jul 2012
  • Research & Ideas

HBS Faculty on Supreme Court Health Care Ruling

The Supreme Court has spoken, and its ruling last Friday has evoked myriad responses from across the United States—from the far right to the far left, from small businesses to giant corporations, from... View Details
Keywords: Re: Multiple Faculty; Health
  • 07 May 2015
  • News

Renegotiating Retiree Health Care Plans After New Supreme Court Guidance

  • Research Summary

What Makes the Bonding Stick? A Natural Experiment Involving the U.S. Supreme Court and Cross-Listed Firms

On March 29, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court signaled its intention to geographically limit the reach of the U.S.securities antifraud regime and thus differentially exclude U.S.-listed foreign firms from the ambit of formal U.S.antifraud enforcement.  We exploit this... View Details

Keywords: Cross-listing; Corporate Governance; Civil Liability; Bonding
  • 2013
  • Working Paper

What Makes the Bonding Stick? A Natural Experiment Involving the U.S. Supreme Court and Cross-Listed Firms

By: Amir N. Licht, Christopher Poliquin, Jordan I. Siegel and Xi Li
On March 29, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court signaled its intention to geographically limit the reach of the U.S. securities antifraud regime and thus differentially exclude U.S.-listed foreign firms from the ambit of formal U.S. antifraud enforcement. We use this legal... View Details
Keywords: Crime and Corruption; International Finance; Investment; Corporate Governance; Governing Rules, Regulations, and Reforms; Courts and Trials; Legal Liability; United States
Related
  • 27 Feb 2023
  • News

Who Is Entitled to Overtime? A New Supreme Court Decision Puts Employers on Notice

  • 29 Jun 2012
  • News

For businesses, Supreme Court ruling provides a measure of clarity in health care calculations

  • 08 Apr 2024
  • News

Trump Immunity Bid Opposed by 19 Top Former Defense Officials in Brief Filed With Supreme Court

  • 05 Jul 2012
  • News

What Now? Health Care After the Supreme Court's Decision

  • 2005
  • Government Testimony

Brief Amici Curiae: Supreme Court of the United States, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., et al., v. Grokster, Ltd., et al.

By: Felix Oberholzer-Gee and Koleman Strumpf
Related
  • 15 Nov 2023
  • HBS Seminar

Leo Strine, Of Counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and, previously, Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court

  • 02 Jul 2012
  • News

Three Harvard Business School Professors Comment on the Supreme Court’s Health Care Decision

  • December 2018
  • Case

DraftKings and the Future of Fantasy Sports

By: Robert F. Higgins and Julia Kelley
Founded in 2012, DraftKings helped change the fantasy sports landscape by popularizing daily fantasy sports (DFS), or short-term fantasy sports tournaments that offered big cash prizes to winners. The company’s valuation exceeded $1 billion by 2015, but DraftKings soon... View Details
Keywords: Fantasy Sports; Daily Fantasy Sports; DraftKings; FanDuel; Supreme Court; Sports Betting; Sports Gambling; Sports; Business Model; Government Legislation; Lawsuits and Litigation; Laws and Statutes; Business Strategy; Internet and the Web; Mobile and Wireless Technology; Games, Gaming, and Gambling; Sports Industry; Entertainment and Recreation Industry; United States; Massachusetts; Boston
Related
  • April 2008 (Revised August 2008)
  • Supplement

AT&T v. Microsoft (B): District Court Ruling and Appeal

By: Willy C. Shih
The (B) case follows the course of Microsoft's settlement with AT&T, and its appeal in the issue of foreign replicated software that eventually goes to the U.S. Supreme Court. It is intended for follow-up the discussion of the (A) case with what happened, examining a... View Details
Keywords: Patents; Lawsuits and Litigation; Conflict and Resolution; Competitive Strategy; Technology Industry
Related
  • 26 Sep 2018
  • News

Religion in the Workplace: What Managers Need to Know

  • March 1984 (Revised October 2005)
  • Case

James vs. United States

By: Henry B. Reiling
The U.S. Supreme Court reconsiders two basically inconsistent prior Supreme Court decisions, overrules one and states that illegally acquired income must be reported. View Details
Keywords: Courts and Trials; Crime and Corruption; Judgments; Taxation; Public Administration Industry; United States
Related
  • January 1988
  • Supplement

Santa Clara County Transportation Agency (B)

Describes manager's decision from the (A) case and resulting court decisions, culminating in landmark 1987 Supreme Court ruling. View Details
Keywords: Decisions; Courts and Trials; Judgments; Transportation Industry; Public Administration Industry
Related