Publications
Publications
Show Results For
- All HBS Web
(119,072)
- Faculty Publications (170)
- 2020
- Conference Presentation
A Performance-optimized Limb Detection Model Selectively Predicts Behavioral Responses Based on Movement Similarity
By: X. Zhao, J. De Freitas, L. Tarhan and G. A. Alvarez
- 2020
- Conference Presentation
Learning World Models with Progress-driven Exploration
By: K-H Kim, M. Sano, J. De Freitas, N. Haber and D. L. K. Yamins
- 2020
- Conference Presentation
Semantic Embeddings of Verbal Descriptions Predict Action Similarity Judgments
By: L. Tarhan, J. De Freitas, G. A. Alvarez and T. Konkle
- 2020
- Conference Presentation
The Capacity Limit of Personal Identity
By: J. De Freitas, J. L. Rips and G. A. Alvarez
- 5 Sep 2019
- Conference Presentation
Capacity Limits for Higher-level Thought? The Self as a Case Study
- July 9, 2019
- Article
Common Knowledge, Coordination, and Strategic Mentalizing in Human Social Life
By: Julian De Freitas, Kyle A. Thomas, Peter DiScioli and Steven Pinker
People often coordinate for mutual gain, such as keeping to opposite sides of a stairway, dubbing an object or place with a name, or assembling en masse to protest a regime. Because successful coordination requires complementary choices, these opportunities raise the... View Details
- 2019
- Conference Presentation
Intrinsic Curiosity May Give Rise to Animate Attention
By: J. De Freitas, K. H. Kim, N. Haber, C. Conwell, G. A. Alvarez and D. L. K. Yamins
- Article
Maimonides' Ladder: States of Mutual Knowledge and the Perception of Charitability
By: Julian De Freitas, Peter DiScioli, Kyle A. Thomas and Steven Pinker
Why do people esteem anonymous charitable giving? We connect normative theories of charitability
(captured in Maimonides’ Ladder of Charity) with evolutionary theories of partner choice to test predictions on how attributions of charitability are affected by states of... View Details
- Article
Optimality Bias in Moral Judgment
By: Julian De Freitas and Samuel G.B. Johnson
We often make decisions with incomplete knowledge of their consequences. Might people nonetheless expect others to make optimal choices, despite this ignorance? Here, we show that people are sensitive to moral optimality: that people hold moral agents accountable... View Details