Eva Ascarza

Eva Ascarza

Jakurski Family Associate Professor of Business Administration

Jakurski Family Associate Professor of Business Administration

Eva Ascarza is the Jakurski Family Associate Professor of Business Administration in the Marketing Unit.  She is the co-founder of the Customer Intelligence Lab at the D^3 institute at Harvard Business School. She teaches the Marketing core in the MBA required curriculum and an elective course titled Managing Customers for Growth.

As a marketing modeler, Professor Ascarza uses tools from statistics, economics, and machine learning to answer relevant marketing questions. Her main research areas are customer management (with special attention to the problem of customer retention), Personalization and Targeting, Marketing AI, and algorithmic decision making. She uses field experimentation (e.g., A/B testing) as well as econometric modeling and machine learning tools not only to understand and predict patterns of behavior, but also to optimize the impact of firms’ interventions. 

Marketing
+1 (617) 495-8542
 
Eva Ascarza
Unit
Contact Information
(617) 495-8542
Featured Work Publications Research Summary Awards & Honors

Eva Ascarza is the Jakurski Family Associate Professor of Business Administration in the Marketing Unit.  She is the co-founder of the Customer Intelligence Lab at the D^3 institute at Harvard Business School. She teaches the Marketing core in the MBA required curriculum and an elective course titled Managing Customers for Growth.

As a marketing modeler, Professor Ascarza uses tools from statistics, economics, and machine learning to answer relevant marketing questions. Her main research areas are customer management (with special attention to the problem of customer retention), Personalization and Targeting, Marketing AI, and algorithmic decision making. She uses field experimentation (e.g., A/B testing) as well as econometric modeling and machine learning tools not only to understand and predict patterns of behavior, but also to optimize the impact of firms’ interventions.

Her research has appeared in leading journals including Marketing Science, Journal of Marketing Research, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. She received the 2014 Frank Bass award, awarded to the best marketing paper derived from a Ph.D. thesis published in an INFORMS-sponsored journal. Her research has been recognized as a Paul E. Green Award finalist (2016 and 2017) and winner (2018), awarded to the best article in the Journal of Marketing Research that demonstrates the greatest potential to contribute significantly to the practice of marketing research. Her research has been recognized as a Weitz-Winer-O'Dell Award finalist (2021) and winner (203), awarded to research that has made the most significant long-term contribution to marketing theory, methodology, and/or practice. She was named a Marketing Science Institute (MSI) Young Scholar in 2017, received the Erin Anderson Award for an Emerging Female Marketing Scholar and Mentor in 2019, and was named MSI Scholar in 2020. She serves on the editorial review board of several top marketing journals including Marketing Science, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing, and Quantitative Marketing and Economics.

Professor Ascarza earned a Ph.D. in marketing from London Business School, a B.S. in mathematics at the Universidad de Zaragoza (Spain), and a M.S. in economics and finance from Universidad de Navarra (Spain). Prior to joining HBS, she was an associate professor in the marketing department at Columbia Business School.

Featured Work
Detecting Routines: Applications to Ridesharing CRM
Routines shape many aspects of day-to-day consumption. While prior work has established the importance of habits in consumer behavior, little work has been done to understand the implications of routines--which we define as repeated behaviors with recurring, temporal structures--for customer management. One reason for this dearth is the difficulty of measuring routines from transaction data, particularly when routines vary substantially across customers. We propose a new approach for doing so, which we apply in the context of ridesharing. We model customer-level routines with Bayesian nonparametric Gaussian processes (GPs), leveraging a novel kernel that allows for flexible yet precise estimation of routines. These GPs are nested in inhomogeneous Poisson processes of usage, allowing us to estimate customers' routines, and decompose their usage into routine and non-routine parts. We show the value of detecting routines for customer relationship management (CRM) in the context of ridesharing, where we find that routines are associated with higher future usage and activity rates, and more resilience to service failures. Moreover, we show how these outcomes vary by the types of routines customers have, and by whether trips are part of the customer’s routine, suggesting a role for routines in segmentation and targeting.
Eliminating unintended bias in personalized policies using Bias Eliminating Adapted Trees (BEAT) - PNAS

An inherent risk of algorithmic personalization is disproportionate targeting of individuals from certain groups (or demographic characteristics such as gender or race), even when the decision maker does not intend to discriminate based on those “protected” attributes. This unintended discrimination is often caused by underlying correlations in the data between protected attributes and other observed characteristics used by the algorithm (or machine learning (ML) tool) to create predictions and target individuals optimally. Because these correlations are hidden in high dimensional data, removing protected attributes from the database does not solve the discrimination problem; instead, removing those attributes often exacerbates the problem by making it undetectable and, in some cases, even increases the bias generated by the algorithm.

We propose BEAT (Bias-Eliminating Adapted Trees) to address these issues. This approach allows decision makers to target individuals based on differences in their predicted behavior—hence capturing value from personalization—while ensuring a balanced allocation of resources across individuals, guaranteeing both group and individual fairness. Essentially, the method only extracts heterogeneity in the data that is unrelated to protected attributes. To do so, we build on the General Random Forest (GRF) framework (S. Athey et al., Ann. Stat. 47, 1148–1178 (2019)) and develop a targeting allocation that is “balanced” with respect to protected attributes.  We validate BEAT using simulations and an online experiment with N=3,146 participants. This approach can be applied to any type of allocation decision that is based on prediction algorithms, such as medical treatments, hiring decisions, product recommendations, or dynamic pricing.

Why You Aren’t Getting More from Your Marketing AI - HBR

Fewer than 40% of companies that invest in AI see gains from it, usually because of one or more of these errors: (1) They don’t ask the right question, and end up directing AI to solve the wrong problem. (2) They don’t recognize the differences between the value of being right and the costs of being wrong, and assume all prediction mistakes are equivalent. (3) They don’t leverage AI’s ability to make far more frequent and granular decisions, and keep following their old practices. If marketers and data science teams communicate better and take steps to avoid these pitfalls, they’ll get much higher returns on their AI efforts.

Journal Articles
Working papers
Book Chapters
Cases and Teaching Materials
Other Publications and Materials
Research Summary
Overview
Professor Ascarza’s research primarily focuses on providing researchers and marketers a better understanding of how to manage customer retention so as to reduce churn and increase firm’s profitability. She addresses these issues by building empirical models of customer relationship management with a focus on understanding and managing customer retention (i.e., reducing customer churn). While previous literature on customer relationship management (CRM) has predominantly used secondary data, she investigates most of these research questions from the lenses of causal inference (e.g., running field experiments). Some of her findings are counter-intuitive at first glance, but compelling once she pins down the underlying mechanisms. For example, some of her recent work challenges the very common practice of focusing on ‘risk of churning’ as the most important metric for proactive churn management. Combining two field experiments in different industries, professor Ascarza shows that, when the goal is to select customers for proactive/preventive retention efforts, identifying customers who have a high risk of churning might be missing the point. In turn, she empirically demonstrates that customers with the highest risk of churning and those who should be targeted are not necessarily the same. In another field study, Professor Ascarza investigates the role of social influence in retention campaigns. Specifically, she examines the role of the (telecommunications) network in influencing usage and retention decisions among customers who did not receive a marketing campaign, but who were connected to those who were targeted in the campaign. She finds a social multiplier of 1.28. That is, the effect of the campaign on first-degree connections of targeted customers is 28% of the effect of the campaign on the targeted customers.
Keywords: Customer Retention; Churn; Field Experiments
Awards & Honors
Winner of the 2023 Weitz-Winer-O'Dell Award for “Retention Futility: Targeting High-Risk Customers Might Be Ineffective” (Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 2018).
Selected as an INFORMS Doctoral Consortium Fellow at the University of Miami in 2023.
Selected as an AMA-Sheth Foundation Doctoral Consortium Faculty Fellow by the American Marketing Association in 2015, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, and 2023.
Finalist for the 2021 Weitz-Winer-O'Dell Award for “The Perils of Proactive Churn Prevention Using Plan Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment” (Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 2016) with Raghuram Iyengar and Martin Schleicher.
Selected as a Marketing Science Institute Scholar in 2020.
Winner of the 2019 Erin Anderson Award for Emerging Female Marketing Scholar and Mentor from the American Marketing Association.
Finalist for the 2019 MSI Robert D. Buzzell Award from the Marketing Science Institute for “In Pursuit of Enhanced Customer Retention Management: Review, Key Issues, and Future Directions” (Customer Needs and Solutions, 2018) with Scott A. Neslin, Oded Netzer, Zachery Anderson, Peter S. Fader, Sunil Gupta, Bruce G.S. Hardie, Aurélie Lemmens, Barak Libai, David Neal, Foster Provost, and Rom Schrift.
Winner of the 2018 Paul E. Green Award from the Journal of Marketing Research for "Retention Futility: Targeting High-Risk Customers Might Be Ineffective" (February 2018).
Finalist for the 2017 Paul E. Green Award from the Journal of Marketing Research for “Beyond the Target Customer: Social Effects in CRM campaigns” (June 2017) with Peter Ebbes, Oded Netzer and Matthew Danielson.
Selected as a Marketing Science Institute Young Scholar in 2017.
Finalist for the 2016 Paul E. Green Award from the Journal of Marketing Research for “The Perils of Proactive Churn Prevention using Plan Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment” (February 2016) with Raghuram Iyengar and Martin Schleicher.
Winner of the 2014 Frank M. Bass Dissertation Paper Award for “A Joint Model of Usage and Churn in Contractual Settings.”
Selected as an INFORMS Doctoral Consortium Fellow at the University of British Columbia in 2008.
Selected as an AMA-Sheth Foundation Doctoral Consortium Fellow by the American Marketing Association in 2007.
Additional Information
CV
Areas of Interest
Additional Information

CV

Areas of Interest

 More

Additional Topics

Industries

 Less